A decade ago, the challenge in corporate learning was access. If employees could only get access to the right content, the thinking went, they would learn what they needed to grow. Organizations invested heavily in vast learning libraries and digital platforms, believing that scale equaled impact. Yet, paradoxically, as content exploded, engagement declined.

When we think about what makes employees truly engaged at work, leadership inevitably sits at the heart of the conversation. But what exactly does effective leadership look like in practice, and how can we measure its impact on engagement? Statistical analyses of engagement data from Mindset Management’s Flow@Work survey has revealed fascinating insights into the relationship between these two concepts.

The current discourse on team effectiveness has evolved significantly, reflecting a shift from earlier factor-based approaches to more multi-level and dynamic frameworks that better account for the complexity of team dynamics in contemporary organisations. Research has consistently affirmed that team effectiveness is an outcome of complex interplays between individual competencies, collective processes, and emergent states, each influenced by contextual and organisational variables.

Many organizations run engagement surveys to find out how employees feel about their work. But what if your survey could go beyond measuring sentiment and uncover the reasons behind it? The Flow@Work engagement survey is more than a traditional engagement tool. It’s a holistic diagnostic solution built by organizational psychologists and data scientists to identify what drives engagement in your organization, and what holds it back.

We’ve all been in those meetings. Leaders nodding politely while someone shares an idea, only for it to disappear into the void. Everyone knows nothing’s going to happen. And that’s the problem. Employee voice isn’t about suggestion boxes or annual surveys. It’s about whether your people believe what they say will lead to change. That belief, or the lack of it, shapes everything from performance to retention to innovation.

Performance feedback is supposed to be the bedrock of employee growth. But what if the very thing we rely on to build engagement is actually doing the opposite? Across many organisations, a troubling trend has emerged: employees report receiving more feedback than ever, yet are often unclear on how to act on it.